About Magic Numbers: 212 and 137

About Magic Numbers: 212 and 137

1.- starting on: 121 = 11x11 and Vig.: 1.2.1 = 21x21

2.- 212 as "reverse" of 121

and on vig.: 2.1.2 = 822 ; and 822 = 137 x 6

137 in 33º n.p (n.primo) drive us to Fine-structure constant : 1/ 137

and Kin 137 is call Ah Vuc Kab, Lord of the center of earth.

137 - It is call "Magic number" aswell.

Here some, of many, lines from internet to look at ....

In physics, the fine-structure constant, commonly denoted α, is afundamental physical constant, namely the coupling constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic interaction. Being a dimensionless quantity, it has constant numerical value in all systems of unitsArnold Sommerfeldintroduced the fine-structure constant in 1916.

Anthropic explanation[edit source | editbeta]

The anthropic principle is a controversial argument of why the fine-structure constant has the value it does: stable matter, and therefore life and intelligent beings, could not exist if its value were much different. For instance, were α to change by 4%, stellar fusion would not produce carbon, so that carbon-based life would be impossible. If α were > 0.1, stellar fusion would be impossible and no place in the universe would be warm enough for life as we know it.[44]

Numerological explanations[edit source | editbeta]

As a dimensionless constant which does not seem to be directly related to any mathematical constant, the fine-structure constant has long fascinated physicists. Richard Feynman, one of the originators and early developers of the theory ofquantum electrodynamics (QED), referred to the fine-structure constant in these terms:

There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e - the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. (My physicist friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!

Richard P. Feynman (1985). QED: The Strange Theory of Light and MatterPrinceton University

Regarding the occurrence of numerological explanations I. J. Good maintains:

There have been a few examples of numerology that have led to theories that transformed society: see the mention of Kirchhoff and Balmer in Good (1962, p. 316) ... and one can well include Kepler on account of his third law. It would be fair enough to say that numerology was the origin of the theories of electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, gravitation.... So I intend no disparagement when I describe a formula as numerological.

When a numerological formula is proposed, then we may ask whether it is correct. ... I think an appropriate definition of correctness is that the formula has a good explanation, in a Platonic sense, that is, the explanation could be based on a good theory that is not yet known but ‘exists’ in the universe of possible reasonable ideas.

A personal NOTE: I first found  about 1/137  on a book "SINCRONICITY" of Massimo Teodorani. About conexión Physics-Psique :Carl G. Jung and Wolfgang Pauli. (Premio novel de Fisica en 1945).

With a history of Pauli sincronicity at hospital room where he died:

¡¡¡ I am on room 137 !!! he said, the Fine-structure constant : 1/ 137 that he was, as many others, looking for understanding. 

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of galacticSpacebook to add comments!

Join galacticSpacebook

Comments

This reply was deleted.
Live Support